One of them was the Benromach Traditional. I last tried this about two and a half years ago, just after it had been released, and I remember it being a pretty good whisky. My notes & scores at the time suggest I was pretty impressed with it. The vatting contained casks of quite young Benromach, balanced with some beautiful older casks dating back before Benromach's long mothballing. Given the complexity, spices, and even hint of smoke that used to be there, many of us suspected at the time that the proportion of older whisky in the vatting must have been reasonably generous.
However, last night was a massive disappointment. The whisky had almost no flavour, a very flat nose, and absolutely no spice, no smoke, and no complexity. The only note everyone got was a mild cereal character, and that was it. The average score from the group was 5.5! The whisky was clearly and obviously very young, and if there was any older whisky in the vatting, it was undetectable.
Once again, this is a great example of what happens too often in this industry: A distillery or bottler launches a new expression and it's great. It builds a reputation and carves a niche in the market, and then two or three years later, the bottler cannot (or chooses not to) maintain the same quality, and the whisky suddenly goes hugely downhill.
In all honesty, I thought last night's Benromach Traditional was one of the most ordinary and least appealing single malts I've ever tasted, and my opinion was shared by most, if not all, of the other 10 colleagues I had around the table. Shame, Gordon & MacPhail, shame. Either start putting more of your older casks back into the vatting, or give the expression an age statement (5 years?) so that we know we're buying a young and tasteless whisky.
Admiral wrote:Once again, this is a great example of what happens too often in this industry: A distillery or bottler launches a new expression and it's great. It builds a reputation and carves a niche in the market, and then two or three years later, the bottler cannot (or chooses not to) maintain the same quality, and the whisky suddenly goes hugely downhill.
Wouldn't everyone have been happier if this had been a (dare I say it) limited edition?
No, I suppose not.
- Double Gold Member
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 6:57 am
- Location: Illinois, USA
What I was wondering from the above discussions is that there seem to be a couple of batches - one bottle I've seen is very pale, like the colour of a white wine like Pinot Grigio and the other is still lightish but a light golden colour (like Chardonnay in comparison).
The lighter one is like this:
Am I right in thinking the better of the two, with suggetsed older stock in the mix, would be slightly darker? Incidentally the darker one is cheaper by £1!
I already have a bottle of the Organic, it's great, but I'm wondering if I liked the Traditional I recently tried in a bar as it's very young and fresh with no older stock in the mix.
vitara7 wrote:i noticed this a few months back, and after talking to keith the distillery manger, he said that this is due to the older traditional bottlings being quite a bit over aged.
the current traditional on the market is 100% whisky from when G+M started back up so its all new benromach.
Well there you go, a clear answer and I agree Admiral that an age statement would be helpful but I suspect we won't see that until they have a 10yo to offer.
Occasionally go to your local whisky bar and sample the newer bottlings to see how it has changed. If it changes to the better, buy again a load and be even more satisfied. You've got enough of your favorite tipple to last you for several years to come.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests