So far the only winner is the LCBO where we buy the stuff.
I lean toward the Lag as it is a wee bit smoother being a few years older.
I've sampled most of the other Islays except the Port Ellen. Ardbeg and Bruichladdich are both wonderful drams as well.
They all have that boldness that reaches out of the glass and says "Hey I'm different than those mainlanders."
Bottom line, if you can wrap your palate around a Laphroaig you find another Islay you'll like easy enough.
What's the worst that can happen...you end up liking Laphroaig the best.
Many people love all three of the Kildalton malts. Some love two and hate one. Some love one and hate the other two.
Interesting. Every Islay lover I know (and believe me, I speak with a lot of them) loves all three. I've yet to hear anyone tell me that there's one (or two) of the Kildalton three that they don't enjoy.
Still, I know several people have posted on these pages that they enjoy one but not another, so diversity rules, right?!
Admiral wrote:I've yet to hear anyone tell me that there's one (or two) of the Kildalton three that they don't enjoy.
Still, I know several people have posted on these pages that they enjoy one but not another....
Are you not contradicting yourself here? Or are you simply distinguishing between in-person and forum opinions?
There have been many posters here who have said that they don't care for Lagavulin, or Ardbeg, or Laphroaig, and that's what I based my statement on. Personally, at one time I loved Lagavulin and hated Laphroaig; of late, I enjoy Laphroaig and find Lagavulin difficult. There is no doubt that, if you like one of these, you are more likely to enjoy the others; but it is no sure thing. The true beauty of the three Kildalton malts is that, no matter how often they are lumped together as birds of a feather, they are distinct whiskies, each with its own characteristics that may be loved or reviled. ScotchPalate may find some statistical significance in Laphroaig fans' appreciation (or lack thereof) for Lagavulin, and he may even make a purchasing decision based on the probabilities derived therefrom. But there is no way to predict for certain whether he will like the stuff; he can only answer that by trying it for himself. I would like to encourage everyone to try everything available, and come to his own conclusions, rather than depend on the judgment of others. I understand that some people have limited budgets, and don't want to be stuck with bottles they don't like, but at some point you have to make the leap. Even a bad bottle is an education, and sometimes what seems a bad bottle becomes an appreciated one as it goes along. (It still has alcohol in it, anyway.) The point is to gain experience, and broaden your knowledge. You can't do that by letting someone tell you that you won't like Lagavulin. If you're thinking about it, go for it.
I don`t personly like any of them Lagavullin (the first singel malt I ever tasted) drinkable and partially enjoyable, Ardbeg drinkable laphroaig to me not drinkable the only whisky I have ever tasted and didn`t drink up.
I think there are some similarites but yet they are very different.
Hm why do I like ledaig 1972 vintage it`s heavily peated ,we have some others that are not islays too f ex Ben riach Autenticus , Ardmore (GmPh) I think I have to do a study of this and find out.
- Paul A Jellis
- Gold Member
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 2:01 am
- Location: Bedfordshire, England
But to answer your question - yes. As a Laphroaig fan I like Lagavulin 16.
- Double Gold Member
- Posts: 1945
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:42 pm
- Location: Reigate, UK
As Les Taylor (or Homer Simpson) would say: "Laphroaig! aaaaahh!"
As Anne-Helen would say: "Laphroaig! aaaarrgghh!"
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests