Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

All your whisky related questions answered here.
Finlay Duncan Mac
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:28 am

Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

Postby Finlay Duncan Mac » Wed Nov 13, 2013 5:31 am

I had been a huge fan of the aforementioned Laga 16 yr. old until just recently. I feel completely ripped off. Just spent 130.00 Canadian on a bottle. This is the first bottle of Lagavulin I have bought in quite a few years.It tastes so diluted! I'd like to try another bottle out to compare( maybe I got a bad batch?)but just can't afford to take the risk of it tasting exactly the same! Has anyone else noticed the quality not being what it used to be?Thank you.

New member
Posts: 29
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:32 pm

Re: Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

Postby opelfruit » Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:20 pm

In 1997 Lagavulin greatly increased production volumes to try to meet a higher demand. So the new bottlings under the new higher volumes would be bottled during 2013.

I've noticed a quality drop off recently, nothing like it used to be years back. It seems more smokey and less body, a thinner beast with the smoke trying to over compensate for the other miss-givings.

I've moved on in the world now and it's no longer a staple.

User avatar
The Third Dram
Triple Gold Member
Posts: 2465
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 8:38 pm

Re: Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

Postby The Third Dram » Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:53 pm

I haven't been very enticed by the 16 Year Old Lagavulin for a while now, and would far rather opt to pay the modest premium in price for the more angular (and interesting to boot) 12 Year Old Cask Strength releases.

User avatar
Silver Member
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:43 am

Re: Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

Postby whiskgeek » Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:32 am

jmrl wrote:Until recently the last time I tried it was about 2 years ago - hardly recognised it - very dissappointed

I've posted about this problem before. When I first noticed it, it was simply peaty. The following year, it was very sweet, but still lacking a lot.

I was at the distillery in September, and totally forgot to get Iain's thoughts on this.

Ganga wrote:Ok, received a sample of very recent Laga 16. I found it to be quite good. Heavy smoke with an oily palate. What is missing is the sweetness that I found in the 2007 and earlier bottlings (no sherry). There are some lemon notes and what I would describe as a beach bonfire. Very good but not exceptional.

Good to hear it's improved over the last year or so. I'll miss the sherry, but I love the bonfire.

User avatar
Double Gold Member
Posts: 1051
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 2:56 pm

Re: Has Lagavulin 16 yr slipped a couple of notches?

Postby bredman » Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:58 am

For whatever reason Diageo took Lagavulin down the designer cask route. Virtually every last cask is ex-bourbon remade into 250L barrels, these then hold grain whisky for the first fill, for several years, then they hold a different malt whisky for a similar length of time. Only then, for the third fill are they filled with Lagavulin. Looks like someone got paranoid about aggressive active wood and made an executive decision lol. Andrew Jefford is told in Peat Smoke And Spirit that the only sherry wood now used is exhausted casks, and only rarely, and increasingly rarer. It was this way for some years before he was told no later than 2004(?). Of course this doesn't include the PX cask finishing for the DE releases.

Return to “Questions & Answers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests