Jack Daniles classifiaction

All your whisky related questions answered here.
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:30 am

Jack Daniles classifiaction

Postby Kimo » Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:35 am

My friends and I have been having this debate for awhile and allot of the online sources are very contradictory. Since you guys are experts I just wanted to know once and for all what JD is officially classified as., a Bourbon or Tennessee whisky and why all the confusion. Thanks a bunch


Bronze Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2003 7:10 pm

Postby SasquatchMan » Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:50 am

Jack Daniel's doesn't qualify as bourbon, as far as I can tell, because it isn't made in Kentucky, and though I believe the mash to be more than 51% corn (requisite for bourbon, I believe) I think the additional filtration steps would eliminate it from the official bourbon crowd. Fact is, Jack Daniel's is a hell of a lot like Bourbon.

I always get these facts wrong, though, and maybe someone else would like to chime in?

Silver Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2000 2:01 am

Postby lexkraai » Sat Oct 30, 2004 10:24 am

Bourbon doesn't have to be made in Kentucky. In fact, there is bourbon made nowadays in Kentucky, Virginia, Indiana, Georgia. And in the recent past Pennsylvania as well.

The mash bill requirements for bourbon and JD are identical. So in that respect JD is not different from a bourbon. The reason why there is a special category for JD and George Dickel is not that they are made in Tennessee, but that the new make spirit is filtered through charcoal before being casked. This is the 'Lincon County Process'. So essentially, JD and GD are 'bourbons with something extra', which allows them to call themselves 'Tennessee Whisky'.

Hope that's clear!

New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 2:30 am

Postby Kimo » Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:59 am

Perfect thank you very much

clayton jr
New member
Posts: 34
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:56 pm

Postby clayton jr » Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:11 pm

JD does indeed qualify as a bourbon in many ways, and in fact was for quite awhile marketed as bourbon. They lobbied the IRS for their own classification based on their filtering process.

Whether that filtering process adds "smoothness" or just removes character and flavor is left up to the individual drinker.

Return to “Questions & Answers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests