I have just seen a programme on TV (In Denmark), Jim Murray made a short appearance, saying Springbank is a very slow maturing whisky, and that it doesn't even think about coming out of bed till its 18 yrs old, at 15 he says, its thinking.
He also says its at its best from 18 yrs til 35 yrs.
Interested in hearing from other Springbank fans, I went there last summer and fell in love with the place (and the whisky too)!
Jim Murray made a short appearance, saying Springbank is a very slow maturing whisky, and that it doesn't even think about coming out of bed till its 18 yrs old, at 15 he says, its thinking.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
That's reassuring: I have a barrel (from the private customer offer Springbank did up until about 2 years ago) which I bought for my son's christening with a view to getting it bottled up for his 18th or 21st (depending on how it's matured and how painful the excise payments are). Does anyone know whether they'll be doing the same again any time soon?
Personally, I generally do not find whiskies older than about 16 years as being worth their considerable added cost when one evaluates them based on their intrinsic value as spirits to be drunk. Even if one goes by Michael Jackson's ratings, whose concept I don't support, older whisky is usually rated just incrementally higher than the standard 10-12 year bottlings.
Malt whisky is an affordable luxury item, which has fallen in recent years very much into the hands of poseurs and collectors. Springbank produces excellant whisky (which I enjoy very much), but the older versions are grossly over-rated and over-priced, with the "local barley" being a good example.
Thanks for your comments.
I had seen some reports on Springbank Millenium tastings and it seemed that the best of the lot was the 35 are you saying it wasn't up to much as I had found a bottle and was just about to spend 270 pounds on it!
I have tasted a 50 year old and can not believe any one would pay 1000 pounds to drink it (it was lets say very different, not unpleasant just different).
I am thinking if it was really good, I should get it as its going to be 6 or 7 years before we get any more 21 so its a long wait for amore 35 year old!
Honestly I personally would not pay 270 for it to drink, I bought it as part of the collection. I thought it lost something rather than gaining more from the wood it seemed as if it deteriated with age. That is my personal opinion but as we all have different taste buds someone else might think it wonderful.
Old 10 year decent enough, new 10 class leading stunning quality.
Old 12 year (dark), a great glass
New 15 year very disappointing.
Old 21 (dark), reference quality
Old 25 very enjoyable but I prefer the dark 21
On the older bottlings, it can be hit and miss. I don’t know the millenium bottlings but I am well versed on independent bottlings of older ages. Generally I find these very fine in quality and can recommend OMC, Signatory, Blackadder and Murray McDavid bottlings from the 60s. The styles range hugely however with the dark 65 Murray McDavid at one extreme and very lightly coloured Signatory 67 at the other. These will suit very different tastes. However even between say Signatory 67 bottlings there is MUCH variation. None have shown any sign of going over but compared with the 21 year old they might look poor value but that is largely academic now (no more 21). They do offer differences but the 21 was such a fine whisky anything is difficult afterwards. I particularly like the MMD 65 bottling, again a dark whisky. I think Springbank takes sherry very well.
As to whether Springbank needs a minimum age, I don’t think so, just try a 10year new bottling, a young Black adder / Signatory or the dreamy 91 MMD and most will be easily won over to the young fold. However I do like the old.
I don't have that much tasted yet, but as far as I can remember the old C.V. and 10 were not so memorable....BUT
got the chance to taste with some friends the 25y Limited Edition....
THE BEST WHISKY I HAVE TASTED!
Great balance, cocnuts, fruity and mature (not woody), very complex, so impressive, hard to find the right words!
I can confirm it fits the 18y-35y age, but have heared from others though, that the 'standard' 25y was over the top, like too woody or oaky.
Small wonder the old 21 is going for 100 pounds a bottle (if you can find it!)
A hot tip for the uninformed: Cadenhead's bottles a vatted malt (Moidart) with a very high percentage of Springbank. Last spring I got a bottle of 30 YO Moidart at Cadenhead's Cannongate shop for 55 quid. If you think the Campbeltown Loch 25 is good - check out some older bottlings of Moidart!
I tasted the rum finish once and it is OK. Not great, but OK. Lost my notes, I think there is a nice balance, with banana or coconut. I fully agree on Dave Brooms comment 'well integrated'. To me it is interesting to have tried it once, but not to be bought at the €100-120 it retails for nowadays. For this money, buy a 21y OB!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests