Glayva Liqueur

Your tastes and our tastes are discussed here, so make sure you share your pleasures with us.
New member
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2001 1:01 am

Glayva Liqueur

Postby JVP » Mon Jan 21, 2002 2:08 am

I was given a bottle of Glayva for Christmas and I was wondering if anyone could tell me a bit more about it?


Bronze Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2001 1:01 am

Postby St.Peat » Sun Jan 27, 2002 2:38 pm

Glayva is a scotch liqueur (herbs, honey and other natural additions for flavor). It is quite easy to come by in California, not very expensive, and it tastes nice, so ... go ahead and try it, don't save it (there's more where that came from). I have heard that it is a favorite base for a Rusty Nail.

If you enjoy it, try to get ahold of some Glenfiddich Liqueur -- it is AFAIK only available at the distillery.

Cheers! Image

[This message has been edited by St.Peat (edited 27 January 2002).]

Silver Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:01 am

Postby Ize » Mon Jan 28, 2002 7:16 am

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Verdana">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by St.Peat:
If you enjoy it, try to get ahold of some Glenfiddich Liqueur -- it is AFAIK only available at the distillery.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

At least here in Europe, Glenfiddich Liquer can be bought from some big whisky shops (like via Internet from, hopefully posting this address isn't faux pas in this forum).

New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2001 1:01 am

Postby howarths » Mon Feb 11, 2002 2:51 pm

The Glenfiddich Liqueur is probably the worst drink I have ever tasted (bar none). It's a total waste of good whisky. I like a whisky liqueur as much as the next person, but this is truly awful. It's like cheap whisky with a tonne of sugar added!

It seems to me a distilleries attempt to get into a market they obviously know little about. IMHO.

Stick with Glayva or Drambuie, they do it much much better.

Silver Member
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:01 am


Postby Ize » Fri Feb 22, 2002 9:19 am

Hello again,

hopefully, high-end whisky fans are not disturbed by me and my postings here. Since I'm a low-end whisky fan with very limited cash funds, I won't focus to 40 Y.O. whiskys, sorry. ;-)

Redbreast, as all of you probably know, is an Irish Pot Still Whiskey (not all malt) and it is 12 Y.O. By curiosity to this rare type of whisky (or whiskey, in this case?) I decided to order a bottle of it and taste it. Redbreast is the most complex whisky I have tasted so far. Obviously, smoke and peat are conspicuous by their absence, since it's Irish. (Hopefully I built that lovely sentence correctly. Image) but the taste in the beginning, in the middle and in the end are all to different directions. So the taste isn't, let's say, compact or in the harmony but I still liked it.

In the beginning the taste is very fulfilling, almost like sense of taste would have been gone numb. This was bit of scary thing with the first sip, but it eases a lot for next sips. I can't with my short experience of the whisky tasting, describe the taste in the beginning. It is something that must be experienced by person him/herself.

In the middle the taste was somewhat ashy, but still not smoky or peaty and in the end the taste was, what I call, very Irish. Maybe it is because of grains.

Only taste that go on and that harmonize a bit of the taste thoughout are vanilla and honey, but they are hardly notable.

Summa summarum, if I would give 10 points to Lagavulin and 8.5 points to Black Bush, I would give 8.25 to Redbreast. Minuses come from lack of the smoke and peat (which I'm very fond of) and pluses come from very lovely complex taste.

[This message has been edited by Ize (edited 22 February 2002).]

Return to “Whisky Tastings”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests