also greatly admire, to be so much better to drink than beer ?
Ganga wrote:...whisky doesn't take up space in the refrigerator...
... or as much space in one's bladder.
But mostly, it's the warmth & intensity factor.
igneous wrote:Bang for the buck. Zero carbs.
Unfortunately not so - alcohol does contain calories and breaks down very quickly into sugars (carbs). In fact, while there is alcohol in your system your metabolism will prioritize it over any other form of energy. It is the 'uber carb'.
igneous wrote:i believe this is incorrect as it is sugars that break down into ethyl alcohol (ethanol) as part of a fermentation or distillation process. the body's metabolic process does not convert the ethyl alcohol back into sugars/carbohydrates upon consumption (all the "-ose" is gone). it is true that one's metabolism will first utilize alcohol over carbs and proteins. this is why one can drink distilled spirits (sans sugary mixers) and eat a balanced or low carb diet and maintain normal weight. i for one strength train and run stairs (5 days a week) and can drink 1-2oz whisky per night without weight impact.
That's correct, the actual chemistry is a bit complicated - I believe alcohol participates in the synthesis of ATP which is the body's form of available energy. The point is there's calories in hard alcohol and many people are misinformed because it's 'low carb'.
I would much rather have alcohol burn than overwhelming bitterness induced by many well regarded American Beers.
But that being said I love aromas so the fact that whisky usually has a giant bang for your buck in terms of aroma complexity and strength, it gets my vote.
1 or 2 onces a night. Hmm. That's hardly going to pile on the pouinds is it? One large one??
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest